Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Detailed Search Results
| No difference between two splint and exercise regimens for people with osteoarthritis of the thumb: a randomised controlled trial |
| Wajon A, Ada L |
| Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2005;51(4):245-249 |
| clinical trial |
| 7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two 6-week splint and exercise regimens for patients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Forty participants were enrolled in a randomised, controlled clinical trial. The experimental group received a newly designed thumb strap splint and an abduction exercise regimen, whereas the control group received current clinical practice consisting of a short opponens splint and a pinch exercise regimen. Outcome measures included pain (VAS at rest in cm), strength (tip pinch in kg), and hand function (Sollerman Test of Hand Function scored out of 80), measured by a blinded assessor at weeks 0, 2, and 6. By week 6 there was no significant difference in the extent of mean improvement between the groups in: pain, 0.5 cm (95% CI -1.1 to 2.1); strength, 0.1 kg (95% CI -0.8 to 0.9); or hand function, 0.7 points (95% CI -3.6 to 5.0). While both groups improved, neither regimen is superior to the other in patients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.
|
The database was last updated on 7 April 2025 (this includes records added or amended since 3 March 2025). The next update is planned for 5 May 2025. The total number of records on the database is 64,836.