Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Home-based electromyography-triggered stimulation in chronic stroke [with consumer summary]
Gabr U, Levine P, Page SJ
Clinical Rehabilitation 2005 Oct;19(7):737-745
clinical trial
2/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine the feasibility of a home-based electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation (ETMS) programme; and (2) to determine ETMS efficacy in increasing affected wrist extension and reducing affected arm impairment. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, pre-post, cross-over design. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation hospital. PATIENTS: Twelve chronic stroke patients with palpable muscle contraction in their affected wrist extensors but no movement (7 males; mean age 59.75 years, age range 44 to 75 years; mean time since stroke 52.75 months, range 13 to 131 months). INTERVENTION: Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either: (a) ETMS use twice every weekday in 35-min increments during an eight-week period followed by an eight-week home exercise programme (ETMS/home exercise programme) (n = 8); or (b) an eight-week home exercise programme followed by use of ETMS twice every weekday in 35-min increments during an eight-week period (home exercise programme) (n = 4). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Fugl-Meyer, Action Research Arm Test and goniometry. RESULTS: After home exercise programme participation, subjects showed nominal or no changes on any of the outcome measures. After ETMS, patients showed modest impairment reductions, as shown by the Fugl-Meyer, and no Action Research Arm Test changes. However, both groups showed a 21 degree increase in active affected wrist extension after ETMS use. CONCLUSION: ETMS use is feasible in the home environment. Neither participation in a traditional home exercise programme nor ETMS use conveyed changes on the Fugl-Meyer or Action Research Arm Test. However, ETMS use increased active affected limb extension. This new movement may provide a potential pathway for subjects to participate in other interventions, such as modified constraint induced therapy.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help