Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

The effect of exercise intensity on the response to exercise rehabilitation in patients with intermittent claudication
Gardner AW, Montgomery PS, Flinn WR, Katzel LI
Journal of Vascular Surgery 2005 Oct;42(4):702-709
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized trial was to compare the efficacy of a low-intensity exercise rehabilitation program versus a high-intensity program in changing physical function, peripheral circulation, and health-related quality of life in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients limited by intermittent claudication. METHODS: Thirty-one patients randomized to low-intensity exercise rehabilitation and 33 patients randomized to high-intensity exercise rehabilitation completed the study. The 6-month exercise rehabilitation programs consisted of intermittent treadmill walking to near maximal claudication pain 3 days per week at either 40% (low-intensity group) or 80% (high-intensity group) of maximal exercise capacity. Total work performed in the two training regimens was similar by having the patients in the low-intensity group exercise for a longer duration than patients in the high-intensity group. Measurements of physical function, peripheral circulation, and health-related quality of life were obtained on each patient before and after the rehabilitation programs. RESULTS: After the exercise rehabilitation programs, patients in the two groups had similar improvements in these measures. Initial claudication distance increased by 109% in the low-intensity group (p < 0.01) and by 109% in the high-intensity group (p < 0.01), and absolute claudication distance increased by 61% (p < 0.01) and 63% (p < 0.01) in the low-intensity and high-intensity groups, respectively. Furthermore, both exercise programs elicited improvements (p < 0.05) in peak oxygen uptake, ischemic window, and health-related quality of life. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of low-intensity exercise rehabilitation is similar to high-intensity rehabilitation in improving markers of functional independence in PAD patients limited by intermittent claudication, provided that a few additional minutes of walking is accomplished to elicit a similar volume of exercise.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help