Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
The effect of 4 different durations of static hamstring stretching on passive knee-extension range of motion |
Ford GS, Mazzone MA, Taylor K |
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 2005;14(2):95-107 |
clinical trial |
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
DESIGN: Pretest-posttest. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of 4 durations of static hamstring stretching on knee-extension passive range of motion (KE-PROM). CONTEXT: Effects of longer (90 and 120 seconds) static hamstring stretching on PROM have not been established relative to more typically recommended 30- or 60-second durations. SUBJECTS: 35 healthy college-age subjects with > 20 degrees loss of KE-PROM. OUTCOME MEASURE: KE-PROM. INTERVENTION: 5-week program of single daily stretch for 30, 60, 90, or 120 seconds. RESULTS: Static stretching was effective in increasing KE-PROM regardless of stretch duration (p < 0.0001). A significant improvement was identified in mean PROM for each stretching group, but no difference existed among the 4 stretch-duration groups. The control group's mean PROM decreased (mean -3.2 degrees, SD 1.9), whereas each stretching group increased PROM (means 1.9 degrees to 3.6 degrees). CONCLUSIONS: Five weeks of daily static hamstring stretching for 30, 60, 90, or 120 seconds increase KE-PROM. Similar benefits were achieved regardless of stretch duration, suggesting that clinicians need not perform static hamstring stretches of more than 30 seconds.
|