Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Is manipulation of moderately displaced Colles' fracture worthwhile? A prospective randomized trial |
Kelly AJ, Warwick D, Crichlow TPK, Bannister GC |
Injury 1997 May;28(4):283-287 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
Thirty elderly patients with moderately displaced Colles' fractures were randomly assigned to manipulation under Bier's block or plaster immobilization alone. Moderately displaced was defined as 10 to 30 degrees of dorsal angulation and less than 5 mm of radial shortening compared with the uninjured side. The groups were well matched for age, sex, fracture type and displacement; immobilization time and rehabilitation were standardized. The outcome measures were: radiological position at union, the functional score of Gartland and Werley, grip strength, cosmesis and algodystrophy assessment. There was no detectable difference between the groups in any of the outcome measures. Two-thirds of the correction of dorsal angulation achieved by manipulation was lost by 5 weeks. We conclude that up to 30 degrees of dorsal angulation and 5 mm of radial shortening may be accepted in selected elderly patients.
|