Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Minimally displaced distal radius fractures: do they need plaster treatment?
Stoffelen D, Broos P
The Journal of Trauma 1998 Mar;44(3):503-505
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

In a prospective, randomized trial, minimally displaced distal radius fractures were divided into two groups: those treated with plaster immobilization for 1 week compared with 3 weeks. Functional Cooney scores were determined at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. No statistical differences could be found in functional outcome between the groups at any time during the evaluation. Although patients did not allow immediate functional treatment in the presence of a fracture, we could not find any differences between 1 week or 3 weeks of plaster treatment. No further dislocation occurred, and all patients experienced eventful healing with good and excellent results in 92% of the cases. We believe, therefore, that only minimal immobilization is required in these fractures and that they should be mobilized as soon as comfort allows.
For more information on this journal, please visit http://www.lww.com.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help