Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Direct clinician-delivered versus indirect family-supported rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial |
Braga LW, da Paz AC, Ylvisaker M |
Brain Injury 2005;19(10):819-831 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: To explore the relative effectiveness of clinician-delivered versus family-supported interventions for children with chronic impairment after TBI. RESEARCH DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Children aged 5 to 12 years in the chronic phase of their recovery were randomly assigned to the clinician-delivered or to the family-supported intervention group; both samples received intensive services for 1 year; physical outcome was measured by the SARAH scales, cognitive outcome by the WISC-III. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Parents in the family-supported intervention sample efficiently acquired the skills needed to deliver physical and cognitive interventions within the context of everyday routines of the child's life at home; family education level was not a factor. Although both groups demonstrated improvements, only the children in the family-supported intervention group demonstrated statistically significant -- and clinically important -- improvements on both outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: This RCT provides compelling evidence for organizing cognitive and physical interventions and supports for children with TBI around the everyday routines of their lives, with intensive supports for their families.
|