Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Prevention of disuse muscle atrophy by means of electrical stimulation: maintenance of protein synthesis |
Gibson JN, Smith K, Rennie MJ |
Lancet 1988 Oct 1;2(8614):767-770 |
clinical trial |
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: No; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
The effect of percutaneous electrical stimulation in preventing immobilisation-induced muscle atrophy was determined from measurements of quadriceps mass, composition, and rate of protein synthesis in seven men who had a fracture of one tibia immobilised in a long-leg cast for 6 weeks. These features were compared with those of fourteen men with similar injuries who did not use an electrical stimulator. In men who did not use the stimulator, quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) at midthigh, measured by ultrasonography, fell by a mean (SD) 17% (10) and the rate of muscle protein synthesis was 23% (10) lower on the immobilised than on the control side (0.037 (0.016) versus 0.048 (0.02) %/h). In contrast, in those who used the stimulator, quadriceps CSA (55.5 (7.3)) cm2 control leg, 50.9 (9.0) cm2 immobilised leg) and the rate of muscle protein synthesis (0.053 (0.009) %/h control leg, 0.059 (0.012) %/h immobilised leg) were similar on the two sides. The results suggest that brief periods of low-voltage percutaneous electrical stimulation will reduce quadriceps atrophy secondary to knee immobilisation, and that the mechanism includes prevention of the fall in muscle protein synthesis that usually occurs on immobilisation.
|