Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Randomized controlled trial of calcaneal taping, sham taping, and plantar fascia stretching for the short-term management of plantar heel pain
Hyland MR, Webber-Gaffney A, Cohen L, Lichtman PT
The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 2006 Jun;36(6):364-371
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, experimental, randomized, single-factor, pretest/posttest design. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of a calcaneal and Achilles-tendon-taping technique, utilizing only 4 pieces of tape and not involving the medial arch, on the symptoms of plantar heel pain. BACKGROUND: Plantar fasciitis is one of the most common causes of heel and foot pain. Physical therapists have applied many techniques in an attempt to relieve the symptoms of plantar heel pain, including various taping methods for which there is little existing evidence. METHODS AND MEASURES: Subjects (n = 41) were randomly assigned into 4 groups: (1) stretching of the plantar fascia, (2) calcaneal taping, (3) control (no treatment), and (4) sham taping. A visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and a patient-specific functional scale (PSFS) for functional activities were measured pretreatment and after 1 week of treatment (posttreatment). RESULTS: A significant difference was found posttreatment among the groups for the VAS (p < 0.001). Specifically, significant differences were found between stretching and calcaneal taping (mean +/- SD 4.6 +/- 0.7 versus 2.7 +/- 1.8; p = 0.006), stretching and control (mean +/- SD 4.6 +/- 0.7 versus 6.2 +/- 1.0; p = 0.026), calcaneal taping and control (mean +/- SD 2.7 +/- 1.8 versus 6.2 +/- 1.0; p < 0.001), and calcaneal taping and sham taping (mean +/- SD 2.7 +/- 1.8 versus 6.0 +/- 0.9; p < 0.001). No significant difference among groups was found for posttreatment PSFS (p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: Calcaneal taping was shown to be a more effective tool for the relief of plantar heel pain than stretching, sham taping, or no treatment.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help