Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Pulsed ultrasound does not affect recovery from delayed onset muscle soreness |
| Shankar G, Sinha AG, Sandhu JS |
| Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences 2006 Jan-Mar;5(1):Epub |
| clinical trial |
| 4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
AIM: To investigate the effects of pulsed ultrasound (US) in recovery from Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS). METHODS: Twelve healthy male athletes (mean age 23.83 +/- 1.697 year) performed an eccentric exercise protocol of non-dominant elbow flexors to induce muscle soreness on 2 occasions separated by 3 weeks. Subjects in experimental group received pulsed US (1 MHz, intensity 0.8 W/cm2, mark space ratio 1:10), whereas control group received sham US after 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. Perception of muscle soreness, active ROM and muscle strength were the parameters measured at 0 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h with the help of VAS, manual goniometer and JONEX muscles master instrument respectively. RESULTS: Post hoc t test analysis revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) between 0 h and 72 h in the parameter of ROM (t = 6.18) and muscle power (t = 2.54) as well as between 24 h and 48 h in the parameter of muscle soreness (t = 3.13) in control group. Similar differences were also observed in the experimental group. No significant inter-group differences at a level of 0.05 was observed in any parameter at any level. CONCLUSION: The pattern of recovery from DOMS was not influenced by the application of pulsed Ultrasound at the parameters discussed here.
|