Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Aerosol bronchodilator delivery methods. Relative impact on pulmonary function and cost of respiratory care
Summer W, Elston R, Tharpe L, Nelson S, Haponik EF
Archives of Internal Medicine 1989 Mar 1;149(3):618-623
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: No; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

Thirty-six acutely III, hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of obstructive airway disease and a greater than 10% increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s after administration of aerosolized bronchodilator were randomized to receive either metaproterenol sulfate delivered by updraft-compressor nebulization (UDN) or terbutaline sulfate delivered by metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a spacer. Serial analyses of pulmonary function measurements were performed with the use of 95% confidence intervals for the percentage response ratios of MDI to UDN. The response to MDI was at least equivalent to that of UDN, and MDI use was associated with no prolongation of hospital stay. Equivalent bronchodilation was achieved with MDI therapy with a lower daily charge for therapy for each patient and less respiratory therapist time. In hospitalized bronchodilator-responsive patients with acute exacerbations of obstructive airway disease, the MDI/spacer combination is the preferred approach when the status of the patient allows its use.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help