Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Respiratory muscle training in restrictive thoracic disease: a randomized controlled trial
Budweiser S, Moertl M, Jorres RA, Windisch W, Heinemann F, Pfeifer M
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2006 Dec;87(12):1559-1565
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of respiratory muscle training (RMT) in patients with restrictive thoracic disorders and intermittent noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV). DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Home-based RMT, with assessment in a primary care pulmonary center. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients with restrictive thoracic disorders; 28 patients completed the trial. INTERVENTION: Three months of RMT by isocapnic hyperpnea or sham training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respiratory muscle strength and endurance, lung function, exercise performance, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). RESULTS: After RMT, maximal inspiratory mouth pressure was increased (27.6% +/- 36.5%, p = 0.013). In patients who could perform cycle ergometer testing (n = 17), peak oxygen consumption (2.24 +/- 3.39 mL/kg/min versus -1.71 +/- 2.54 mL/kg/min, p = 0.014) and maximal work rate (9.4 +/- 14.8 W versus -5.1 +/- 10.8 W, p = 0.043) increased relative to a control group. Similar differences occurred regarding changes of HRQOL (physical performance, 3.3 +/- 11.4 score versus -6.6 +/- 9.0 score; p = 0.012) and time of ventilator use (-0.6 +/- 1.2 h/d versus 0.4 +/- 0.5 h/d, p = 0.010). Lung volumes, 12-second maximum voluntary ventilation, 6-minute walking distance, and blood gases were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with restrictive thoracic disorders and NPPV, RMT improved inspiratory muscle strength. Exercise performance and HRQOL were improved when the 2 groups were compared. RMT was practicable and safe despite severe respiratory impairment. Further evaluation, including different training intensities and modalities, seems warranted.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help