Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Randomized controlled trial of rehabilitation at home after stroke: one-year follow-up of patient outcome, resource use and cost |
von Koch L, de Pedro-Cuesta J, Kostulas V, Almazan J, Widen Holmqvist L |
Cerebrovascular Diseases 2001 Aug;12(2):131-138 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study sought to evaluate early supported discharge and continued rehabilitation at home after stroke, at a minimum of 6 months after the intervention, in terms of patient outcome, resource use and health care cost. METHODS: Eighty-three patients, moderately impaired 5 to 7 days after acute stroke, were included in a randomized controlled trial, 42 being allocated to the intervention and 41 to routine rehabilitation. One-year follow-up of patient outcome included mortality, motor capacity, dysphasia, activities of daily living, social activities, perceived dysfunction, and self-reported falls. Resource use over 12 months included inpatient hospital care, outpatient health care, use of health-related services, informal care, and cost of health care. RESULTS: On univariate analysis there was no difference in patient outcome. Multivariate regression analysis showed that intervention had a significant effect on independence in activities of daily living. A significant difference in inpatient hospital care, initial and recurrent, was observed, with a mean of 18 (intervention) versus 33 days (control) (p = 0.002). Further significant differences were that the control group registered more outpatient visits to hospital occupational therapists (p = 0.02), private physical therapists (p = 0.03) and day-hospital attendance (p <= 0.001), while the intervention group registered more visits to nurses in primary care (p = 0.03) and home rehabilitation (p <= 0.001). Other differences in outcomes or resource utilization were nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: In Sweden, early supported discharge with continued rehabilitation at home proved no less beneficial as a rehabilitation service, and provided care and rehabilitation for 5 moderately disabled stroke patients over 12 months after stroke onset for the cost of 4 in routine rehabilitation.
|