Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Comparison of BiPAP nasal ventilation and ventilation via iron lung in severe stable COPD
Lien TC, Wang JH, Chang MT, Kuo CD
Chest 1993 Aug;104(2):460-466
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

The effects of noninvasive ventilators on COPD remain controversial because of their obscure mechanisms. A randomized crossover study, using iron lung and positive pressure nasal ventilation (BiPAP) each for 40 min, was performed in 11 stable patients with severe COPD. Throughout the study, we monitored surface EMGdi, EMGst, ECG, SaO2, ETCO2, and the movements of RC and AB. Afterwards the data were replayed to calculate VT, RR, PR, VT/TI, iEMG, and phase angle. No statistically significant improvement was found in view of the above parameters. However, the percentage of iEMGst change after 40-min BiPAP ventilation, compared with the baseline, was much more significant in patients with FEV1 below 0.55 L than those with FEV1 above 0.55 L (n = 4:7, delta iEMGst -62.93 percent +/- 23.27 percent versus 32.45 percent +/- 42.79 percent, p = 0.0056). delta iEMGst correlated significantly with FEV1 during BiPAP ventilation (p < 0.05, r = 0.59). We conclude that the iEMGst during short-term BiPAP ventilation correlates with the severity of the disease.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help