Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Predictive value of lipid profile for salutary coronary angiographic changes in patients on a low-fat diet and physical exercise program
Niebauer J, Hambrecht R, Velich T, Marburger C, Hauer K, Kreuzer J, Zimmermann R, von Hodenberg E, Schlierf G, Schuler G, Kubler W
The American Journal of Cardiology 1996 Jul 15;78(2):163-167
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

In this study, 113 patients with modestly elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (< 210 mg/dl) and coronary artery disease were randomized to an intervention group (n = 56) or a control group (n = 57). The intervention program consisted of daily exercise and a low-fat diet according to the American Heart Association's recommendation phase III; patients in the control group received "usual care" rendered by their private physician. After 1 year, complete data were available for all 92 patients (intervention: n = 40; control: n = 52) who underwent repeat coronary angiography. During the study course, patients in the intervention group showed an increase in apolipoprotein A-I (123 +/- 18 versus 129 +/- 20 mg/dl; p < 0.02) and apolipoprotein A-I/B (1.3 +/- 0.4 versus 1.5 +/- 0.4; p < 0.01) and a decrease in apolipoprotein B (99 +/- 20 versus 89 +/- 18 mg/dl; p < 0.01), while apolipoprotein A-II remained unchanged (38 +/- 6 versus 38 +/- 6 mg/dl; p = NS). In the control group, there were no significant changes (apolipoprotein A-I, 124 +/- 17 versus 128 +/- 13 mg/dl; apolipoprotein A-II, 38 +/- 6 versus 39 +/- 6 mg/dl; apolipoprotein B, 100 +/- 21 versus 99 +/- 16 mg/dl; apolipoprotein A-I/B, 1.3 +/- 0.3 versus 1.4 +/- 0.5; all p = NS). As previously reported, there was a significant retardation of progression in patients in the intervention group (progression 23%, no change 45%, regression 32%) compared with the control group (progression 48%, no change 35%, regression 17%) (p < 0.05). Although retardation of progression was significantly associated with an increase in apolipoprotein A-I/B and a decrease in apolipoprotein B (p < 0.05), these gave way in multivariate analysis to changes in total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, absolute levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and, in a subgroup of patients, to leisure-time physical activity (all p < 0.05). These data demonstrate that an intervention based on a low-fat diet and intensive physical exercise is capable of improving apolipoprotein levels, associated with retardation of progression of coronary artery disease. However, total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol appear superior to apolipoproteins as metabolic markers for effective treatment in patients with coronary artery disease.
With permission from Excerpta Medica Inc.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help