Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Stroke rehabilitation. Three exercise therapy approaches
Dickstein R, Hocherman S, Pillar T, Shaham R
Physical Therapy 1986 Aug;66(8):1233-1238
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of three exercise therapy approaches. Three groups of adult stroke patients (N = 131) participated in the study. The first group received conventional treatment that consisted of traditional exercises and functional activities. The treatment of the second group was based on proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques. The third group was treated using the Bobath approach. The improvement of each patient was evaluated after six weeks of treatment in terms of functional gains in activities of daily living as measured using the Barthel Index, changes in the muscle tone of the involved limbs as measured using a five-point ordinal scale, changes in the isolated motor control of the ankle and wrist as measured by tests of muscle strength and range of motion, and changes in the patients' ambulatory status as measured using a nominal scale of four categories. The therapeutic effects of exercise according to each of the three approaches were compared using descriptive and nonparametric statistical methods. No substantial advantage could be attributed to any one of the three therapeutic approaches.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help