Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Dental appliances in the treatment of snoring. A comparison between an activator, a soft-palate lifter, and a mouth-shield
Marklund M, Franklin KA
Swedish Dental Journal 1996;20(5):183-188
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

Different dental appliances have been recommended in the treatment of snoring. The aim of the present study was to compare three different dental appliances regarding patient tolerance and the effect of snoring. Fifteen consecutive snorers were randomly selected to treatment with either a mandibular advancement device (activator), a soft-palate lifter or a mouth-shield. The activator satisfactorily reduced snoring in four out of five patients. At four-year follow-up, two patients had discontinued the treatment, one due to craniomandibular disorder. The soft-palate lifter had insufficient effect on snoring in four out of five patients. The results suggest that the activator has a satisfactory tolerance and effect on snoring, while the soft-palate lifter and the mouth-shield are ineffective in the treatment of snoring.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help