Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Physiotherapist-directed exercise, advice, or both for subacute low back pain: a randomized trial [with consumer summary]
Pengel LH, Refshauge KM, Maher CG, Nicholas MK, Herbert RD, McNair P
Annals of Internal Medicine 2007 Jun 5;146(11):787-796
clinical trial
9/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Advice and exercise are widely recommended for subacute low back pain, but the effectiveness of these interventions is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of physiotherapist-prescribed exercise, advice, or both for subacute low back pain. DESIGN: Factorial randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: 7 university hospitals and primary care clinics in Australia and New Zealand. PATIENTS: 259 persons with subacute low back pain (> 6 weeks and < 3 months in duration). INTERVENTION: Participants received 12 physiotherapist-directed exercise or sham exercise sessions and 3 physiotherapist-directed advice or sham advice sessions over 6 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were average pain over the past week (scale, 0 to 10), function (Patient-Specific Functional Scale), and global perceived effect (11-point scale) at 6 weeks and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), number of health care contacts, and depression (Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21). RESULTS: Exercise and advice were each slightly more effective than placebo at 6 weeks but not at 12 months. The effect of advice on the pain scale was -0.7 point (95% CI -1.2 to -0.2 point; p = 0.011) at 6 weeks and -0.4 point (CI -1.0 to 0.3 point; p = 0.27) at 12 months, whereras the effect of exercise was -0.8 point (CI -1.3 to -0.3 point; p = 0.004) at 6 weeks and -0.5 point (CI -1.1 to 0.2 point; p = 0.14) at 12 months. The effect of advice on the function scale was 0.7 point (CI 0.1 to 1.3 points; p = 0.014) at 6 weeks and 0.6 point (CI 0.1 to 1.2 points; p = 0.023) at 12 months, and the effect of exercise was 0.4 point (CI -0.2 to 1.0 point; p = 0.174) at 6 weeks and 0.5 point (CI -0.1 to 1.0 point; p = 0.094) at 12 months. The effect of advice on the global perceived effect scale was 0.8 point (CI 0.3 to 1.2 points; p < 0.001) at 6 weeks and 0.3 point (CI -0.2 to 0.9 point; p = 0.24) at 12 months, and the effect of exercise was 0.5 point (CI 0.1 to 1.0 point; p = 0.017) at 6 weeks and 0.4 point (CI -0.1 to 1.0 point; p = 0.134) at 12 months. When administered together, exercise and advice had larger effects on all outcomes at 6 weeks (effect on pain, -1.5 (CI -2.2 to -0.7 point; p = 0.001), with similar results for other primary outcomes); however, by 12 months, there was a statistically significant effect only for function (effect, 1.1 points (CI 0.3 to 1.8 points); p = 0.005). LIMITATION: Physiotherapists were not blinded. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with subacute low back pain, physiotherapist-directed exercise and advice were each slightly more effective than placebo at 6 weeks. The effect was greatest when the interventions were combined. At 12 months, the only effect that persisted was a small effect on participant-reported function.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help