Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Detailed Search Results
| A comparison of the effectiveness of sensory integrative therapy and perceptual-motor training in treating children with learning disabilities |
| Humphries T, Wright M, Snider L, McDougall B |
| Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics 1992 Feb;13(1):31-40 |
| clinical trial |
| 6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
This study compared the effect of sensory integration therapy (SI), perceptual-motor training (PM) and no treatment (NT) on the performance of 103 children with learning disabilities and sensory integrative dysfunction, aged 58 to 107 months, who were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups or to no treatment. After receiving a total of 72 1-hour sessions of therapy for 3 hours per week, PM-treated subjects showed significant gains over the other two groups, primarily in gross motor performance. SI-treated subjects showed an advantage in motor planning. There were no accompanying group differences in visual perception, handwriting readiness, copying ability, cognitive, academic, language and attentional skills or in self-concept. These findings demonstrate motor gains resulting from motor treatments without carry-over to functional skills and abilities more directly associated with school performance.
|
The database was last updated on 5 May 2025 (this includes records added or amended since 7 April 2025). The next update is planned for 2 June 2025. The total number of records on the database is 65,032.