Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

A randomized, single blind placebo controlled clinical trial on the effect of continuous ultrasound on low back pain
Ansari NN, Ebadi S, Talebian S, Naghdi S, Mazaheri H, Olyaei G, Jalaie S
Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology 2006 Nov;46(6):329-336
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

Low back pain (LBP) is a very common problem in primary care and a major cause of disability. There is no evidence for the efficacy of therapeutic modalities such as ultrasound in LBP In a randomized, single blind placebo controlled clinical trial, we aimed to evaluate the effect of continuous ultrasound (US) in patients with non specific LBP Of the fifty eight patients recruited, 10 patients (8 women and 2 men) randomly allocated to ultrasound (n = 5) or placebo controlled (n = 5) groups. The patients were treated by either US or sham-US for ten sessions, three days per week, every other day. The outcome measures were Functional Rating Index (FRI), Hmax/Mmax ratio and range of motion (ROM), which were measured at baseline, after 5 treatment sessions and at the end of treatment. To analyze the data, The Mann Whitney U test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test were used. After treatment, both US and placebo groups showed statistically significant decrease in FRI scores indicating improvement in functional ability (p = 0.042 and p = 0.043, respectively). The mean changes of FRI during the second five treatment sessions and after the end of treatment was significantly better in the US group than in the placebo group (p = 0.016 and p = 0.032, respectively). Before and after treatment, the mean H reflex latency and Hmax/Mmax ratio, right and left side were similar in the groups (p > 0.05), and no significant changes were observed in the treatment groups (p > 0.05). After treatment, the extension and lateral flexion range of motion significantly increased in the US group (p = 0.04), but the back movements in the placebo group did not show significant changes (p > 0.05). The present study supports the significant effect of US on LBP, and suggests that US may improve the functional ability of patients with non specific low back pain.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help