Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Nebulizer versus spacer for bronchodilator delivery in patients hospitalized for acute exacerbations of COPD |
Berry RB, Shinto RA, Wong FH, Despars JA, Light RW |
Chest 1989 Dec;96(6):1241-1246 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
This double-blind crossover study compared the efficacy of two methods of delivery (MDI-spacer and nebulizer) of inhaled albuterol to patients hospitalized for an acute exacerbation of COPD. Within 24 h of admission, 20 subjects (mean age 69 years) with severe airflow obstruction (mean FEV 0.69 L) were subjected to a treatment with an MDI-spacer (0.36 mg of albuterol or placebo) followed by treatment with a nebulizer (2.5 mg of albuterol or placebo). Active drug was given by only one device (randomly assigned in a double-blind manner), and the entire sequence was repeated in 4 h, with active drug given in the alternate device. Spirometric data and the Borg dyspnea score were obtained before and 1 h after each sequence of treatments. Treatment resulted in significant improvements in the FEV1, FVC, and Borg score. The percent improvement in the FEV1 was slightly larger after treatment with the nebulizer (16.7 percent versus 13.4 percent). Improvements in the Borg score were slightly larger after treatment with the MDI-spacer (-1.08 versus -0.73). However, these differences were not statistically significant. This study suggests that the MDI-spacer system is an effective method of sympathomimetic delivery in this setting, provided patients are able to master the technique.
|