Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Right ventricular function during weaning from respirator after coronary artery bypass grafting. Comparison of two different weaning techniques
Schirmer U, Calzia E, Lindner KH, Goertz A, Georgieff M
Chest 1994 May;105(5):1352-1356
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

The purpose of this investigation was to determine right ventricular function during weaning from controlled ventilation comparing a biphasic positive airway pressure ventilatory support system (BiPAP (Respironics)) with pressure support ventilation (PSV). In 22 patients following coronary artery bypass grafting, both weaning techniques were used in randomized chronological order for 60 min each. Right ventricular end-systolic (RVESV) and end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) and ejection fraction (RVEF) were evaluated using the fast-response Swan-Ganz catheter. In comparison to PSV, the BiPAP system resulted in a significantly higher mean pulmonary artery pressure (20.6 +/- 5.0 versus 19.3 +/- 4.2 mmHg, p = 0.0158), pulmonary vascular resistance index (206 +/- 55 versus 181 +/- 61 dyn.s/cm5/m2, p = 0.0355), RVESV (92.2 +/- 36.3 versus 77.2 +/- 30.4 ml, p = 0.0017), and RVEDV (176.4 +/- 48.5 versus 161.8 +/- 43.3 ml, p = 0.0061), while the RVEF was significantly lower (46.0 +/- 11.9 versus 51.8 +/- 12.4 percent, p = 0.0012). No differences in left ventricular function or arterial blood gas analyses were measured during both study periods. In summary, the RV afterload was higher with the BiPAP system compared with PSV which suggested that this was due to differences in the respiratory support between both weaning modes. Because of the Frank-Starling mechanism, this higher afterload did cause a small but significant increase in RV volumes and a significant decrease in RV ejection fraction with the BiPAP system.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help