Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Outcome data from the LEAP (Live, Eat and Play) trial: a randomized controlled trial of a primary care intervention for childhood overweight/mild obesity |
McCallum Z, Wake M, Gerner B, Baur LA, Gibbons K, Gold L, Gunn J, Harris C, Naughton G, Riess C, Sanci L, Sheehan J, Ukoumunne OC, Waters E |
International Journal of Obesity 2007 Apr;31(4):630-636 |
clinical trial |
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVES: To reduce gain in body mass index (BMI) in overweight/mildly obese children in the primary care setting. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) nested within a baseline cross-sectional BMI survey. SETTING: Twenty nine general practices, Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: (1) BMI survey: 2,112 children visiting their general practitioner (GP) April to December 2002; (2) RCT: individually randomized overweight/mildly obese (BMI z-score < 3.0) children aged 5 years 0 months to 9 years 11 months (82 intervention, 81 control). INTERVENTION: Four standard GP consultations over 12 weeks, targeting change in nutrition, physical activity and sedentary behaviour, supported by purpose-designed family materials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: BMI at 9 and 15 months post-randomization. Secondary: Parent-reported child nutrition, physical activity and health status; child-reported health status, body satisfaction and appearance/self-worth. RESULTS: Attrition was 10%. The adjusted mean difference (intervention-control) in BMI was -0.2 kg/m2 (95% CI -0.6 to 0.1; p = 0.25) at 9 months and -0.0 kg/m2 (95% CI -0.5 to 0.5; p = 1.00) at 15 months. There was a relative improvement in nutrition scores in the intervention arm at both 9 and 15 months. There was weak evidence of an increase in daily physical activity in the intervention arm. Health status and body image were similar in the trial arms. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention did not result in a sustained BMI reduction, despite the improvement in parent-reported nutrition. Brief individualized solution-focused approaches may not be an effective approach to childhood overweight. Alternatively, this intervention may not have been intensive enough or the GP training may have been insufficient; however, increasing either would have significant cost and resource implications at a population level.
|