Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Did mobility and balance of residents living in private old age homes improve after a mobility exercise programme: a pilot study |
Au-Yeung SSY, Ho HPY, Lai JWC, Lau RWK, Wong AYL, Lau SK |
Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal 2002;20:16-21 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
Residents in private old age homes (POAHs) usually adopt a sedentary lifestyle, making them prone to physical deconditioning. This study examined the effects of a short-term mobility exercise programme on the balance and mobility of elderly residents residing in POAHs in Hong Kong. Subjects recruited from three POAHs were matched in demographoc characteristics and ambulatory status before assigning them to either mobility exercise (M) programme or control (C) programme of general exercise. Both programmes consisted of 18 sessions that were conducted three times a week over two months. The subjects mobility and balance performance before, mid-term, at completion of the programmes and three months afterward was evaluated using the 4-metre walk (4MW) test, timed up-and-go (TUG) test and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Ten and eight subjects completed the M and C programmes, respectively. The M group did not demonstrate improvement in 4MW, TUG or BBS score at completion of the programme. At 3 months after the programme, only the C group experienced a significant decrease in BBS score (p = 0.02). The short M programme did not significantly improve the mobility and balance performance of elderly residents of POAHs, but the performance appeared to be maintained for three months after the programme stopped. Randomized studies on longer programmes with revised protocols are recommended.
|