Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Predictors of response to exercise training in severe chronic congestive heart failure
Meyer K, Gornandt L, Schwaibold M, Westbrook S, Hajric R, Peters K, Beneke R, Schnellbacher K, Roskamm H
The American Journal of Cardiology 1997 Jul 1;80(1):56-60
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

We prospectively assessed whether baseline central hemodynamics and exercise capacity can predict improvement of VO2 at ventilatory threshold (VT) after exercise training in patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure. Eighteen patients (mean +/- SEM; age 52 +/- 2 years), half of them listed for transplant, underwent 3 weeks of exercise training (interval cycle and treadmill walking; 5 x/week) and 3 weeks of activity restriction in a random-order crossover trial. Baseline data were not significantly different for groups with exercise training first and activity restriction first: cardiac index at rest (2.1 +/- 0.1 L/m2/min), maximum cardiac index (3.1 +/- 0.2 L/m2/min) (Fick), and echocardiographic ejection fraction (21 +/- 1%). The same was true for cardiopulmonary exercise data (cycle ergometry; up 12.5 W/min): VO2 at VT (9.3 +/- 0.4 ml/kg/min), maximum VO2 (12.2 +/- 0.7 ml/kg/min), VT in percentage of predicted maximum VO2 (31 +/- 2%), heart rate at VT (95 +/- 4 beats/min), and decrease of dead space-to-tidal volume ratio from rest to VT (33 +/- 1 to 29 +/- 1). Improvement of VO2 at VT after training (2.2 +/- 0.4 ml/kg/min; p < 0.001) was not related to baseline central hemodynamics (r =< 0.10 for each), but was greater in patients with a lower baseline VO2 at VT (r = -0.65; p < 0.01), peak VO2 (r = -0.66; p < 0.01), VT in percentage of predicted maximum VO2 (r = -0.74; p < 0.001), heart rate at VT (r = -0.63; p < 0.01), and smaller decrease of dead space-to-tidal volume ratio from rest to VT (r = 0.65; p < 0.01). Ejection fraction after exercise training (24 +/- 2%) and activity restriction (23 +/- 2%) did not differ significantly compared with baseline, and patient status (heart failure and cardiac rhythm) remained stable. Three parameters accounted for 84% of the variance of improvement in VO2 at VT:VO2 at VT in percent predicted maximum VO2, decrease of dead space-to-tidal volume ratio, and heart rate at VT. The findings suggest that there was a greater increase in VO2 at VT after exercise training in patients with greater peripheral deconditioning at baseline. The improvement was unrelated to central hemodynamics. Clinically stable patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure, potential heart transplant candidates, and those awaiting transplantation may benefit from involvement in a short-term exercise training program.
With permission from Excerpta Medica Inc.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help