Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Detailed Search Results
| Results of frequency differences in ultrasonic therapy |
| Griffin JE, Echternach JL, Bowmaker KL |
| Physical Therapy 1970 Apr;50(4):481-486 |
| clinical trial |
| 4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: No; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
Patients with chronic arthritis were treated with a low frequency or with the standard ultrasonic frequency without other variables. A significantly greater number of patients who received the low frequency had longer-lasting relief from pain than did those who received the standard frequency. Variation in results appeared to be caused by difference in depth penetration.
|
The database was last updated on 2 December 2024 (this includes records added or amended since 4 November 2024). The next update is planned for 3 February 2025. The total number of records on the database is 63,680.