Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Acupuncture in patients with dysmenorrhea: a randomized study on clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in usual care |
Witt CM, Reinhold T, Brinkhaus B, Roll S, Jena S, Willich SN |
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2008 Feb;198(2):166.e161-166.e168 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of acupuncture in patients with dysmenorrhea. STUDY DESIGN: In a randomized controlled trial plus non-randomized cohort, patients with dysmenorrhea were randomized to acupuncture (15 sessions over three months) or to a control group (no acupuncture). Patients who declined randomization received acupuncture treatment. All subjects were allowed to receive usual medical care. RESULTS: Of 649 women (mean age 36.1 +/- 7.1 years), 201 were randomized. After three months, the average pain intensity (NRS 0 to 10) was lower in the acupuncture compared to the control group: 3.1 (95% CI 2.7 to 3.6) versus 5.4 (4.9 to 5.9), difference -2.3 (-2.9 to -1.6); p < 0.001. The acupuncture group had better quality of life and higher costs (overall ICER Euro 3,011 per QALY). CONCLUSION: Additional acupuncture in patients with dysmenorrhea was associated with improvements in pain and quality of life as compared to treatment with usual care alone and was cost-effective within usual thresholds.
|