Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Efficacy of a target-matching foot-stepping exercise on proprioception and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis |
Jan M-H, Tang P-F, Lin J-J, Tseng S-C, Lin Y-F, Lin D-H |
The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 2008 Jan;38(1):19-25 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
DESIGN: A randomized clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of high, repetitive, target-matching foot-stepping exercise (TMFSE) performed in a sitting position on pro-prioception, functional score, and walking velocity for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). BACKGROUND: Researchers have suggested that exercises to address knee OA should include proprioceptive training. However, most patients cannot tolerate conventional proprioceptive training, performed in a standing position. METHODS AND MEASURES: Forty-nine subjects (mean age +/- SD 63.3 +/- 8.1 years) with knee were randomly assigned to the exercise or no intervention groups. The exercise group practiced FSE in sitting, 3 sessions weekly for 6 weeks. All subjects underwent assessments of knee reposition error, functional incapacity score, and walking velocity prior to and after intervention. RESULTS: The TMFSE significantly improved reposition error from a mean +/- SD of 3.0 degrees +/- 1.6 degrees to 1.5 degrees +/- 0.6 degrees, walking velocity on ground level from 44.1 +/- 2.9 to 38.6 +/- 2.5 seconds for 60 m, time to complete a stairs task from 34.2 +/- 2.1 to 26.5 +/- 2.3 seconds, time to complete a figure-of-eight from 51.3 +/- 6.7 to 29.1 +/- 3.6 seconds, and score on a functional incapacity scale from 12.0 +/- 3.1 to 4.9 +/- 1.7, in subjects with knee OA after a 6-week intervention (p < 0.0125). In contrast, the control group showed no change in any of the measured tests. CONCLUSION: TMFSE in sitting appears to be an option for exercise in patients with mild to moderate knee OA. This may be an especially attractive option for patients who may have pain with weight-bearing exercises. A longitudinal study with a larger sample size is needed to confirm the potential use of TMFSE for patients with knee OA.
|