Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Influence of combined exercise training on indices of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes patients [with consumer summary] |
| Lambers S, van Laethem C, van Acker K, Calders P |
| Clinical Rehabilitation 2008 Jun;22(6):483-492 |
| clinical trial |
| 7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of combined exercise training on indices of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes patients. DESIGN: A double-blind randomized controlled trial with patients receiving either combination (COM), endurance (END) or no training (C). SETTING: Sint-Jozef hospital (Belgium), general practice (Holland). SUBJECTS: Forty-six type 2 diabetes patients (17 female, 29 male). INTERVENTIONS: COM versus END and C. Patients exercised for three months, three times a week for 1 hour. MAIN MEASURES: Six-minute walk test (6MWT), peak VO2, strength in upper and lower limbs, sit-to-stand, height, weight, body mass index, fat mass, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), glycaemia, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), total cholesterol and quality of life (General Health Survey Short Form (SF-36)). RESULTS: COM had significant better results on sit-to-stand (p < 0.05), 6MWT (p < 0.01), strength in upper (p < 0.001) and lower limbs (p < 0.001) compared with C. A different evolution among COM and C was found for HbA1c (p < 0.05) and cholesterol (p < 0.01), both decreased in COM and increased in C. HDL increased in COM and decreased in C (p < 0.01). END had significant higher results on the 6MWT (p < 0.01) compared with C. Compared with END, COM had significantly higher results on strength in upper (p < 0.01) and lower limbs (p < 0.01). The evolution of SF-36 items was not significantly different between the three groups. CONCLUSION: In diabetes type 2 patients, COM had significant better effects on indices of physical condition, diabetes and cardiovascular risk compared with C. Compared with END, COM gave a tendency towards better results, however more research with a larger number of participants is needed.
|