Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Absorbent products for urinary/faecal incontinence: a comparative evaluation of key product designs |
Fader M, Cottenden A, Getliffe K, Gage H, Clarke-O'Neill S, Jamieson K, Green N, Williams P, Brooks R, Malone-Lee J |
Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England) 2008 Jul;12(29):1-208 |
clinical trial |
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
Copyright release for this abstract has not been granted.
|