It has been suggested that deep partial-thickness burns of the hand which remain unhealed by 14 days should be excised and totally resurfaced. Controlled data supporting this suggestion is not available. Therefore, a prospective randomized study was performed on 222 burns of the hand to evaluate if excision and skin grafting had any advantage over conservative management. Full-thickness burns were eliminated from the series by excision and grafting them as soon as possible after the diagnosis had been made. To eliminate the very superficial burns, randomization did not take place until the wound had remained unhealed for ten days and would not heal for at least another week. In the two groups, the first ten days were managed similarly with topical antibacterials, escharotomies when necessary, and splinting in the "safe" position. Conservatively managed hands were treated with scarlet red gauze dressing as soon as all eschar had been removed. Those cases randomized into the excision and grafting group were operated upon approximately day 14. Physical therapy was the same in both groups except for the immediate period after grafting. Results were recorded by active and passive joint measurements and photographs on predetermined days throughout the study. In this study, spontaneous healing, taking as much as five weeks, gave acceptable results, comparable to excision and grafting performed at two weeks. The use of range of motion exercises, accurate splinting and pressure allowed optimal healing and prevented stiffness and contractures in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two treatment modalities.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help

• DOI
• PubMed
• PDF locator
• publisher