Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
A phase II exploratory cluster randomized controlled trial of a group mobility training and staff education intervention to promote urinary continence in UK care homes [with consumer summary] |
Sackley CM, Rodriguez NA, van den Berg M, Badger F, Wright C, Besemer J, van Reeuwijk KT, van Wely L |
Clinical Rehabilitation 2008 Aug;22(8):714-721 |
clinical trial |
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVES: To assess feasibility, acceptability and potential efficacy of group exercise and staff education intervention to promote continence in older people residing in care homes. To establish measures and information to inform a larger trial. DESIGN: Phase II pilot exploratory cluster randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Six purposively selected care homes in the West Midlands, UK. SUBJECTS: Thirty-four care home residents (mean age 86, 29 female), 23 with cognitive impairments. INTERVENTION: Physiotherapy-led group exercise and staff continence and mobility facilitation training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reported continence status, Rivermead Mobility Index. Feasibility was assessed by uptake and compliance, and acceptability by verbal feedback. A staff knowledge questionnaire was used. RESULTS: Thirty-three residents, cluster sizes from 3 to 7. The number of residents agreeing with the statement 'do you ever leak any urine when you don't mean to?' in the intervention group decreased from 12/17 at baseline to 7/17 at six weeks in the intervention group and increased from 9/16 at baseline to 9/15 at six weeks. The Rivermead Mobility Index scores were better in the intervention group (n = 17; baseline: 6.1, six weeks: 6.2) compared with controls (n = 16; baseline: 5.9, six weeks: 4.75). The intervention was feasible, well received and had good compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Group mobility training and staff education to promote continence is feasible and acceptable for use with care home residents, including those with cognitive impairment.
|