Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Postoperative intermittent positive pressure breathing versus physiotherapy
Schuppisser JP, Brandli O, Meili U
American Journal of Surgery 1980 Nov;140(5):682-686
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

Seventeen patients admitted to the hospital to undergo elective upper abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups: intermittent positive pressure breathing or physiotherapy. Postoperative pulmonary care in the two groups differed only with regard to administration of intermittent positive pressure breathing and chest physical therapy. Prospective evaluation included clinical examination, whole body plethysmography and determination of arterial blood gases preoperatively and on the 3rd postoperative day. Preoperative pulmonary function data were remarkably similar in the two groups. There was no difference in postoperative plethysmographic status in the two groups. Although not statistically significant, the postoperative decrease in paitial arterial oxygen pressure was more pronounced in the physiotherapy group. Neither of the two therapeutic modalities is more effective than the other in preventing postoperative pulmonary complications. Considering the potential hazards, chest physical therapy is clearly the preferred treatment.
With permission from Excerpta Medica Inc.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help