Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

A comparative study of orthoplast cock-up splints versus ready-made Droitwich work splints in juvenile chronic arthritis
Eberhard BA, Sylvester KL, Ansell BM
Disability and Rehabilitation 1993;15(1):41-43
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

A comparative study of a purpose-made cock-up orthoplast splint with a ready-made Camp Droitwich splint, was undertaken in 12 children with juvenile chronic arthritis involving the wrists and carpi. The splints were randomly allocated so that in half, the dominant hand received the orthoplast and in half the non-dominant. Assessments of joint range, grip strength and functional activities were undertaken at 3 and 6 months after use of the splint; the durability of the splints was also assessed. Overall both splints performed their function adequately, the Camp Droitwich being preferred for comfort, but the orthoplast maintaining a slightly better joint position.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help