Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

A randomised study of home-based electrical stimulation of the legs and conventional bicycle exercise training for patients with chronic heart failure
Harris S, le Maitre JP, Mackenzie G, Fox KA, Denvir MA
European Heart Journal 2003 May;24(9):871-878
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

AIMS: Recent guidelines recommend regular exercise in the management of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). This study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of conventional bicycle exercise and functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the legs as forms of home-based exercise training for patients with stable CHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-six patients (38 male) with stable NYHA Class II/III heart failure underwent a 6-week training programme using either a bicycle ergometer or electrical stimulation of the quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles. In the bike group, significant increases were seen in 6-min walk (44.6m, 95% confidence interval (CI) 29.3 to 60.9 m), treadmill exercise time (110 s, 95% CI 72.2 to 148.0 s), maximum leg strength (5.32 kg, 95% CI 3.18 to 7.45 kg), and quadriceps fatigue index (0.08, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.12) following training. In the stimulator group, similar significant increases were seen following training for 6-min walk (40.6m, 95% CI 28.2 to 53.0m), treadmill exercise time (67 s, 95% CI 11.8 to 121.8s), maximum leg strength (5.35 kg, 95% CI 1.53 to 9.17 kg), and quadriceps fatigue index (0.10, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.17). Peak VO2 did not change in either group following training, indicating a low-intensity regime. Quality of life scores improved following training when the bicycle and stimulator groups were considered together, but not when considered separately (-0.43, 95% CI -8.13 to -0.56). CONCLUSIONS: FES produces beneficial changes in muscle performance and exercise capacity in patients with CHF. Within this study, the benefits were similar to those observed following bicycle training. FES could be offered to patients with heart failure as an alternative to bicycle training as part of a home-based rehabilitation programme.
For more information on this journal, please visit http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals/EUHJ.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help