Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Recovery after minor traffic injuries: a randomized controlled trial
Ottosson C, Pettersson H, Johansson SE, Nyren O, Ponzer S
PLoS Clinical Trials 2007 Mar;2(3):E14
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of an acute multidisciplinary group intervention on self-perceived recovery following minor traffic-related musculoskeletal injuries. DESIGN: Open, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A large inner-city hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 127 patients (>= 15 y) with traffic-related acute minor musculoskeletal injuries and predicted to be at risk for delayed recovery were randomized into an intervention group (n = 65) or a control group (n = 62). INTERVENTION: Four 1.5h sessions in open groups with the aim of providing information about injuries in general, calling attention to the importance of self-care and promoting physical activity. In addition, both groups received standard medical care by regular staff. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was self-reported recovery at 12 mo. Secondary outcome measures were ratings of functional health status (SF-36, SMFA), pain and mental distress on visual analog scales, and self-reported duration of sick leave. RESULTS: At 12 mo, there was a 21.9 percentage point difference: 52.4% of the patients in the intervention group and 30.5% in the control group reported self-perceived recovery (95% confidence interval for the difference 5% to 38%; p = 0.03). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding the secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSION: A simple group intervention may accelerate the self-perceived recovery in selected patients. As we did not find evidence of improvements in the secondary outcome measures, the clinical significance of the treatment benefit remains to be defined.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help