Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effect of strength and power training on physical function in community-dwelling older adults
Miszko TA, Cress ME, Slade JM, Covey CJ, Agrawal SK, Doerr CE
The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2003 Feb;58(2):M171-M175
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: The performance of daily tasks, such as stair climbing or lifting an object, requires both muscle strength and power. Age-associated reductions in strength and power can affect an older adult's ability to complete daily tasks such as stair climbing and lifting a child. METHODS: The purposes of this study were to determine whether power training was more efficacious than strength training for improving whole-body physical function in older adults and to examine the relationship between changes in anaerobic power and muscle strength and changes in physical function. Thirty-nine men and women (mean age +/- SD 72.5 +/- 6.3 years) with below-average leg extensor power were randomly assigned to control (C, n = 15), strength-training (ST, n = 13) or power-training (PT, n = 11) groups. The ST and PT groups met 3 days per week for 16 weeks; the C group maintained usual activity and attended three lectures during the course of the study. Primary outcome measures included the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance test, maximal strength, and anaerobic power. RESULTS: After baseline was controlled for, the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance test total score was significantly greater for the PT group than for the ST (p = 0.033) and C (p = 0.016) groups. Maximal strength was significantly greater for the ST group than for the C group (p = 0.015) after the intervention. There was no significant difference between groups for peak anaerobic power. CONCLUSIONS: Power training was more effective than strength training for improving physical function in community-dwelling older adults.
Copyright the Gerontological Society of America. Reproduced by permission of the publisher.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help