OBJECTIVE: To compare three pediatric asthma interventions for their impact on improving the health status of inner-city asthmatic children and in achieving cost savings. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 212 children 1 to 16 years of age were randomized into three groups: group 1 (n = 74) received one individualized asthma education session; group 2 (n = 68) received reinforced asthma education; group 3 (n = 70) received reinforced asthma education plus case management. Asthma-related health resource utilization and cost were primary outcomes. The cost-benefit analysis sought to estimate the expected cost savings to the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services (Medicaid administrator) associated with the intervention. RESULTS: Participants in all three groups used significantly fewer emergency health care services in the follow-up year. Averaged across all three groups, the magnitudes of declines were substantial: 81% for hospitalizations, 69% for hospital days, 64% for emergency department visits, and 58% for clinic visits. Although there were no statistically significant differences between study groups for three of the four main outcome measures, group 3 participants consistently improved to the greatest degree. All three interventions were associated with considerable cost savings ranging from $4,021/child/year for group 1 to $4,503/child/year for group 3. CONCLUSION: Asthma education with or without case management services enhances the health of children with asthma thereby reducing associated costs.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help

• DOI
• PubMed
• PDF locator
• publisher