Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Using internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program
Tate DF, Wing RR, Winett RA
JAMA 2001 Mar 7;285(9):1172-1177
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

CONTEXT: Rapid increases in access to the internet have made it a viable mode for public health intervention. No controlled studies have evaluated this resource for weight loss. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a structured internet behavioral weight loss program produces greater initial weight loss and changes in waist circumference than a weight loss education web site. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial conducted from April to December 1999. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-one healthy, overweight adult hospital employees aged 18 to 60 years with a body mass index of 25 to 36 kg/m2. Analyses were performed for the 65 who had complete follow-up data. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to a 6-month weight loss program of either internet education (education; n = 32 with complete data) or internet behavior therapy (behavior therapy; n = 33 with complete data). All participants were given 1 face-to-face group weight loss session and access to a web site with organized links to internet weight loss resources. Participants in the behavior therapy group received additional behavioral procedures, including a sequence of 24 weekly behavioral lessons via e-mail, weekly online submission of self-monitoring diaries with individualized therapist feedback via e-mail, and an online bulletin board. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Body weight and waist circumference, measured at 0, 3, and 6 months, compared the 2 intervention groups. RESULTS: Repeated-measures analyses showed that the behavior therapy group lost more weight than the education group (p = 0.005). The behavior therapy group lost a mean (SD) of 4.0 (2.8) kg by 3 months and 4.1 (4.5) kg by 6 months. Weight loss in the education group was 1.7 (2.7) kg at 3 months and 1.6 (3.3) kg by 6 months. More participants in the behavior therapy than education group achieved the 5% weight loss goal (45% versus 22%; p = 0.05) by 6 months. Changes in waist circumference were also greater in the behavior therapy group than in the education group at both 3 months (p = 0.001) and 6 months (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Participants who were given a structured behavioral treatment program with weekly contact and individualized feedback had better weight loss compared with those given links to educational web sites. Thus, the internet and e-mail appear to be viable methods for delivery of structured behavioral weight loss programs.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help