Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects of motor imagery on hand function during immobilization after flexor tendon repair
Stenekes MW, Geertzen JH, Nicolai JA, de Jong BM, Mulder T
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009 Apr;90(4):553-559
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether motor imagery during the immobilization period after flexor tendon injury results in a faster recovery of central mechanisms of hand function. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 28) after surgical flexor tendon repair were assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. INTERVENTION: Kinesthetic motor imagery of finger flexion movements during the postoperative dynamic splinting period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The central aspects of hand function were measured with a preparation time test of finger flexion in which subjects pressed buttons as fast as possible following a visual stimulus. Additionally, the following hand function modalities were recorded: Michigan Hand Questionnaire, visual analog scale for hand function, kinematic analysis of drawing, active total motion, and strength. RESULTS: After the immobilization period, the motor imagery group demonstrated significantly less increase of preparation time than the control group (p = 0.024). There was no significant influence of motor imagery on the other tested hand function (p > 0.05). All tests except kinematic analysis (p = 0.570) showed a significant improvement across time after the splinting period (p <= 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Motor imagery significantly improves central aspects of hand function, namely movement preparation time, while other modalities of hand function appear to be unaffected.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help