Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Exercise effects on bone mineral density, falls, coronary risk factors, and health care costs in older women: the randomized controlled senior fitness and prevention (SEFIP) study |
Kemmler W, von Stengel S, Engelke K, Haberle L, Kalender WA |
Archives of Internal Medicine 2010 Jan 25;170(2):179-185 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: Physical exercise affects many risk factors and diseases and therefore can play a vital role in general disease prevention and treatment of elderly individuals and may reduce costs. We sought to determine whether a single exercise program affects fracture risk (bone mineral density (BMD) and falls), coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors, and health care costs in community-dwelling elderly women. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial from May 1, 2005, through July 31, 2008, recruiting women 65 years or older who were living independently in the area of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany. In all, 246 women were randomly assigned to an 18-month exercise program (exercise group) or a wellness program (control group). The exercise group (n = 123) performed a multipurpose exercise program with special emphasis on exercise intensity; the controls (n = 123) focused on well-being with a low-intensity, low-frequency program. The main outcome measures were BMD, the number of falls, the Framingham-based 10-year CHD risk, and direct health care costs. RESULTS: For the 227 women who completed the 18-month study, significant exercise effects were observed for BMD of the lumbar spine (mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) percentage of change in BMD (baseline to follow-up) for the exercise group: 1.77% (1.26% to 2.28%) versus controls: 0.33% (-0.24% to 0.91%); p < 0.001), femoral neck (exercise group: 1.01% (0.37% to 1.65%) versus controls: -1.05% (-1.70% to -0.40%); p < 0.001), and fall rate per person during 18 months (exercise group: 1.00 (0.76 to 1.24) versus controls: 1.66 (1.33 to 1.99); p = 0.002). The 10-year CHD risk was significantly affected in both subgroups (absolute change for the exercise group: -1.96% (95% CI, -2.69% to -1.23%) versus controls: -1.15% (-1.69% to -0.62%); p = 0.22), with no significant difference between the groups. The direct health care costs per participant during the 18-month intervention showed nonsignificant differences between the groups (exercise group: Euro 2,255 (95% CI 1,791 to 2,718) versus controls: Euro 2,780 (2,187 to 3,372); p = 0.20). CONCLUSION: Compared with a general wellness program, our 18-month exercise program significantly improved BMD and fall risk, but not predicted CHD risk, in elderly women. This benefit occurred at no increase in direct costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00267839.
|