Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Supervised fitness walking in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. A randomized, controlled trial |
Kovar PA, Allegrante JP, MacKenzie CR, Peterson MG, Gutin B, Charlson ME |
Annals of Internal Medicine 1992 Apr 1;116(7):529-534 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a program of supervised fitness walking and patient education on functional status, pain, and use of medication in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. DESIGN: An 8-week randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Inpatient and outpatient services of an orthopedic hospital in an academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 102 patients with a documented diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis of one or both knees participated in the study. Data were obtained on 47 of 51 intervention patients and 45 of 51 control patients. INTERVENTIONS: An 8-week program of supervised fitness walking and patient education or standard routine medical care. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were evaluated and outcomes assessed before and after the intervention using a 6-minute test of walking distance and scores on the physical activity, arthritis impact, pain, and medication subscales of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (AIMS). RESULTS: Patients randomly assigned to the walking program had a 70-meter increase in walking distance relative to their baseline assessment, which represents an improvement of 18.4% (95% Cl, 9.8% to 27.0%). In contrast, controls showed a 17-meter decrease in walking distance relative to their baseline assessment (p < 0.001). Improvements in functional status as measured by the AIMS physical activity subscale were also observed in the walking group but not in the control group (p < 0.001); patients assigned to the walking program improved 39% (Cl, 15.6% to 60.4%). Although changes in scores on the arthritis impact subscale were similar in the two groups (p = 0.093), the walking group experienced a decrease in arthritis pain of 27% (Cl, 9.6% to 41.4%) (p = 0.003). Medication use was less frequent in the walking group than in the control group at the post-test (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: A program of supervised fitness walking and patient education can improve functional status without worsening pain or exacerbating arthritis-related symptoms in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
|