Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

High- versus low-intensity inspiratory muscle interval training in patients with COPD
Preusser BA, Winningham ML, Clanton TL
Chest 1994 Jul;106(1):110-117
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

This study determined the effect of a high versus low resistive inspiratory muscle interval training protocol on inspiratory muscle strength (PImax), incremental inspiratory threshold loading (Pitl), inspiratory muscle endurance (IE), and 12-minute distance test (12 MD) in severely impaired patients with COPD. We used a double-blind, two-group, repeated-measure design. Group 1 (n = 12) received supervised high resistive loading at approximately 52 percent PImax and group 2 (n = 8) received supervised low resistive loading at approximately 22 percent PImax. All subjects trained three times weekly (progressing from 5 min per session in week 1 to 18 min per session in week 12) for 12 weeks. After three practice sessions, measures of PImax, Pitl, IE, and 12 MD were taken at baseline, at 4-week intervals, and within 72 h of completing the protocol. Group 1 showed significant improvement in all four dependent variables while group 2 improved in Pitl, IE, and 12 MD. The results suggest there is no significant difference between high and low resistive interval training in more severely impaired patients with COPD.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help