Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Randomised controlled trial of nurse continence advisor therapy compared with standard urogynaecology regimen for conservative incontinence treatment: efficacy, costs and two year follow up |
| Moore KH, O'Sullivan RJ, Simons A, Prashar S, Anderson P, Louey M |
| BJOG 2003 Jul;110(7):649-657 |
| clinical trial |
| 6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
Copyright release for this abstract has not been granted.
|