Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effects of a computer-based, telephone counseling system on physical activity |
Pinto BM, Friedman R, Marcus BH, Kelley H, Tennstedt S, Gillman MW |
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2002 Aug;23(2):113-120 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in developing interventions to promote physical activity (PA) that do not involve face-to-face contact with health professionals. We developed a fully automated PA counseling system (telephone-linked communication, TLC-PA) that was delivered via telephone. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial with 298 adult, sedentary members (mean age 45.9 years; 72% women; 45% white; and 45% African American) of a multi-site medical practice. The comparison group (TLC-Eat) received an automated intervention promoting healthy eating, which was also delivered via telephone. INTERVENTION: The TLC-PA promoted moderate-intensity PA (MI-PA) based on the transtheoretical model of behavior change and social cognitive theory. The system was available to participants for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOMES: Energy expenditure in MI-PA, proportion of participants who met recommendations for MI-PA, and motivational readiness for PA. MEASURES: Self-reports of PA behavior and motivational readiness at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. RESULTS: At 3 months, intention-to-treat analyses showed that the TLC-PA group was more likely to meet recommendations for MI- or vigorous-intensity PA (VI-PA) compared to the TLC-Eat group (TLC-PA 26% versus TLC-Eat 19.6%, p = 0.04). Among study completers, TLC-PA subjects reported significantly higher daily kilocalorie energy expenditure in MI-PA (2.3 kcal/kg/d versus 2.0 kcal/kg/d, p = 0.02); a larger proportion met recommendations for MI- or VI-PA (31.2% versus 21.3%, p = 0.02) and were in more advanced stages of motivational readiness than TLC-Eat subjects (TLC-PA 52.5% versus TLC-Eat 42.2%, p = 0.04). Results were not maintained at 6 months. The proportion of TLC-PA users decreased significantly over the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: A fully automated counseling system had positive short-term effects on PA among sedentary adults. Lack of maintenance of effects may be due to a decrease in the number of participants who continued to use the system.
|