Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| The effect of aerobic training on rehabilitation outcomes after recent severe brain injury: a randomized controlled evaluation |
| Bateman A, Culpan FJ, Pickering AD, Powell JH, Scott OM, Greenwood RJ |
| Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001 Feb;82(2):174-182 |
| clinical trial |
| 7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of fitness training with recently brain-injured inpatients on exercise capacity and functional and psychologic outcome measures. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial of exercise versus relaxation training for 3 months. Blind assessments were conducted before and after the end of a 12-week training program, as well as at follow-up assessment 12 weeks posttraining. SETTING: Four regional neurologic inpatient rehabilitation units. PATIENTS: Of 157 patients recruited 24 +/- 14 weeks after single-incident brain injury, 142 patients were assessed at week 12, and 128 patients at follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized between cycle ergometer aerobic training and a relaxation training control condition, which was theoretically inert with respect to cardiovascular fitness. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Validation of exercise training (peak work rate, peak heart rate, body mass index); mobility and physical function (modified Ashworth scale, Berg balance scale, Rivermead Mobility Index, 10-m walk velocity); disability and dependency (Barthel Index, FIM instrument, Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living); and psychologic function (fatigue questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). RESULTS: Significant improvements in exercise capacity (p < 0.05) in the exercise training group (n = 70) relative to the control group (n = 72) were not matched by greater improvements in functional independence, mobility, or psychologic function, at either 12 weeks or follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of improved cardiovascular fitness did not appear to extend to measurable change in function or psychologic state.
|