Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Cardiorespiratory fitness and quality of life at different exercise intensities after myocardial infarction |
Benetti M, de Araujo CLP, Santos RZD |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia 2010 Sep;95(3):399-404 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: Studies relating physical exercises and health have contributed to elucidate the influence of sedentary habits on the incidence of cardiovascular diseases. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of different intensities of aerobic exercises on patients' functional capacity (VO2peak) and quality of life after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Eighty-seven men (57.7 +/- 6.1 years old) were enrolled in this prospective study and assigned to one of three groups: (a) high-intensity physical training (n = 29) at 85% maximum heart rate for 12 weeks; (b) moderate-intensity training (n = 29) at 75% maximum heart rate for 12 weeks; and (c) control group (n = 29), who were followed. The training groups did aerobic exercises five times a week in 45-minute sessions, besides muscular strengthening and stretching exercises. Maximum VO2 was measured through a cardiopulmonary test, and quality of life was assessed through the MacNew Questionnaire. RESULTS: Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant increase in VO2peak (p < 0.05) in the high-intensity training group (from 29.9 +/- 2.2 ml/kg/min to 41.6 +/- 3.9 ml/kg/min) compared with the moderate-intensity training group (from 32.0 +/- 5.3 ml/kg/min to 37.1 +/- 3.9 ml/kg/min). Additionally, both training groups showed a significant increase in this parameter compared with the control group (from 31.6 +/- 3.9 ml/kg.min to 29.2 +/- 4.1 ml/kg/min). Quality of life improved significantly (p < 0.05) in the high-intensity training group (from 5.66 to 6.80) and in the moderate-intensity training group (from 5.38 to 6.72), but not in the control group (from 5.30 to 5.15). CONCLUSION: Exercises of greater intensity resulted in an increase in functional capacity and quality of life in patients after myocardial infarction.
|