Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Action observation treatment improves recovery of postsurgical orthopedic patients: evidence for a top-down effect?
Bellelli G, Buccino G, Bernardini B, Padovani A, Trabucchi M
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2010 Oct;91(10):1489-1494
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether action observation treatment (AOT) may also improve motor recovery in postsurgical orthopedic patients, in addition to conventional physiotherapy. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Department of rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N = 60) admitted to our department postorthopedic surgery were randomly assigned to either a case (n = 30) or control (n = 30) group. Exclusion criteria were age 18 years or younger and 90 years or older, Mini-Mental State Examination score of 21 of 30 or lower, no ambulating order, advanced vision impairment, malignancy, pneumonia, or heart failure. INTERVENTIONS: All participants underwent conventional physiotherapy. In addition, patients in the case group were asked to observe video clips showing daily actions and to imitate them afterward. Patients in the control group were asked to observe video clips with no motor content and to execute the same actions as patients in the case group afterward. Participants were scored on functional scales at baseline and after treatment by a physician blinded to group assignment. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Changes in FIM and Tinetti scale scores, and dependence on walking aids. RESULTS: At baseline, groups did not differ in clinical and functional scale scores. After treatment, patients in the case group scored better than patients in the control group (FIM total score, p = 0.02; FIM motor subscore, p = 0.001; Tinetti scale score, p = 0.04); patients in the case group were assigned more frequently to 1 crutch (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to conventional physiotherapy, AOT is effective in the rehabilitation of postsurgical orthopedic patients. The present results strongly support top-down effects of this treatment in motor recovery, even in nonneurologic patients.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help