Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Very short intermittent versus continuous bouts of activity in sedentary adults |
Macfarlane DJ, Taylor LH, Cuddihy TF |
Preventive Medicine 2006 Oct;43(4):332-336 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: Whether accumulating short intermittent bouts of light-to-moderate physical activity (LMPA) can elicit significant improvements in the fitness of sedentary adults, compared to one longer continuous bout. METHODS: Fifty sedentary 35- to 60-year-old adults in Hong Kong were randomly appointed to one of two gender-balanced intervention programs: exercise prescription model (EPM) of 30-minute continuous activity, 3 to 4 days per week, or a lifestyle group (LIFE) of 6-minute activity, 5 times per day, 4 to 5 days per week. Aerobic fitness (VO2max), mass, body composition, blood pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, and body mass index (BMI) were assessed at baseline (December 1995) and after 8 weeks. RESULTS: Nearly half of bouts by the LIFE group were <= 6 min, while 85% of the EPM bouts were >= 30 min, with no differences in additional energy expenditure between groups (EPM: 163.0 +/- 89.6 MET h versus LIFE: 148.2 +/- 71.6 MET h). Both groups significantly improved their VO2max, 7.4% (ES 0.36) and 5.3% (ES 0.24) for the EPM and Lifestyle groups respectively (F[1,43] = 34.0, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Accumulating multiple short bouts of LMPA, of which about 50% were <= 6 min, can provide significant improvements in the fitness of sedentary adults that is not dissimilar as one continuous bout of similar total duration.
|