Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effects of an intervention addressing working technique on the biomechanical load of the neck and shoulders among hairdressers |
Veiersted KB, Gould KS, Osteras N, Hansson GA |
Applied Ergonomics 2008 Mar;39(2):183-190 |
clinical trial |
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
The purpose of this study was to describe, and analyse the effect of an intervention on, the biomechanical workload in the neck and shoulder region of female hairdressers. Arm elevation was measured by inclinometers and muscular load of m. trapezius by electromyography. The intervention comprised working technique recommendations, eg, to work with less elevated arms and more relaxed muscles. The subjects were randomised between two different intensity levels of the intervention, one with written information only and the other with additional personal follow-up. The effect of the intervention was evaluated after 1 to 2 months. The hairdressers worked with their arms elevated 60 degrees or more for approximately 13% of the total working time and 16% during the specific hairdressing tasks. The intervention group including personal follow-up instructions had a reduction in workload from 4.0% to 2.5% of hairdressing time with highly elevated right upper arm, ie, above 90 degrees. No effect was detected on muscular load or neck and shoulder symptoms after the intervention.
|